Hover a line for its translation; hover a word for its meaning. Tap 🔊 to hear it.
Generate a brand-new dialog on any topic, using this lesson's 0 vocab words — plus any words you add below.
Sign in to generate dialogues. It needs a pass — the first ten lessons of every course are free either way.
Loud is not angry, and other calibrations
Spanish conversational conflict is read wrongly by most visitors in one direction: it sounds far worse than it is. Volume rises, people interrupt, positions are stated flatly, and two people can appear to be having a row about regional politics five minutes before ordering another round together. Lesson 94 made the point about interrupting; this is the same principle applied to disagreement. Loudness is engagement, and a Spaniard who lowers their voice and becomes very polite in the middle of an argument is signalling something much worse than one who shouts. That said, the calibration cuts both ways, and a foreigner who concludes that anything goes will get it wrong too. Three things do real damage. Personal characterisation rather than positions — attacking somebody's intelligence, family or origin — is as offensive here as anywhere. Certain subjects are not abstract for the person you are talking to: Catalan or Basque independence, the monarchy, the Church, immigration, and above all the war and the dictatorship of lesson 97. And the visitor's verdict is unwelcome in a way the visitor's question never is. Asking a Spaniard how they see the independence question is ordinary; telling them what the answer obviously is, on a fortnight's acquaintance, is not. What this lesson's phrases actually buy you is the ability to hold a position without escalating. The two-part shape — puede que tengas razón, pero… — is the single most useful thing in it, because it lets you disagree while visibly not dismissing the other person. yo diría and yo matizaría mark your statement as yours rather than as the truth. en parte sí concedes the sound half of an argument. And the exits matter as much as the moves: dejémoslo, en eso no nos vamos a poner de acuerdo, and the graceful visto así, cambio de postura, which costs nothing and is admired. One asymmetry worth knowing. Spanish argument tolerates far more directness about ideas than English does — eso no es verdad, no estoy de acuerdo, te equivocas are all sayable to a friend's face without the elaborate cushioning English demands — while being rather less tolerant of the cold, correct, point-scoring register that English speakers sometimes mistake for politeness. Warmth plus directness is the combination that works. That is why the conversation in this lesson ends with zanjado, entonces, and why nobody in it is offended.