Hover a line for its translation; hover a word for its meaning. Tap 🔊 to hear it.
Generate a brand-new dialog on any topic, using this lesson's 0 vocab words — plus any words you add below.
Sign in to generate dialogues. It needs a pass — the first ten lessons of every course are free either way.
An argument older than the gap it explains
La questione meridionale has been running since the 1870s, when the first parliamentary inquiries reported on conditions in the former Bourbon kingdom, and the debate has reversed itself more than once. The long-dominant account held that the South entered unification already poorer and that the gap followed from that. A revisionist account, prominent since the 1990s and popular in the South, holds that the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies was not markedly behind in 1860 — it had industry, a merchant fleet and substantial reserves — and that annexation, conscription, free trade and the transfer of those reserves northwards impoverished it. Economic historians mostly find the truth uncomfortable for both: the pre-unification gap looks real but modest, and it widened sharply afterwards. What makes this worth a lesson is Peppe's point rather than the history. The sentence Alex repeated — il Sud è rimasto indietro — is not neutral: remained behind presupposes a race and a direction, and that presupposition is the thing under argument. The mentality explanation he dismisses is a live one in Italian public conversation and it is reversible, which Lesson 86 will show: the same reasoning is applied northwards with different adjectives. Note how much of this lesson's grammar is doing argumentative work — sostenere rather than dire, the backshift marking what is reported rather than endorsed, and the present tense in i numeri esistono standing out precisely because nothing around it is in the present.