Hover a line for its translation; hover a word for its meaning. Tap 🔊 to hear it.
Generate a brand-new dialog on any topic, using this lesson's 0 vocab words — plus any words you add below.
Sign in to generate dialogues. It needs a pass — the first ten lessons of every course are free either way.
What remittances do, and what they cost
Aminata gives this in nine lines and the last two are the argument. The scale behind it is worth setting out, because the subject is usually discussed either as a heartwarming story or as a development problem, and it is both. **The scale.** Remittances to Senegal are large enough to matter macroeconomically — consistently a substantial share of GDP, comparable to or exceeding foreign aid, and far more reliably delivered. Across sub-Saharan Africa the total exceeds official development assistance. Unlike aid, it arrives in households and is spent on what households choose: school fees, medical costs, food, and above all construction. The half-finished houses on the edge of every Senegalese town are the visible form of the money. **What is said in favour.** It is money with no conditions, no consultants and no overhead, going directly to the people who need it and spent by them rather than for them. It funds education and healthcare that the state does not. It is counter-cyclical — when things get worse at home, emigrants send more. And the obligation of lesson 82 means it reaches people who have no other claim on anything. **What is said against, and this is Aminata's half.** Dependence. A household with reliable income from abroad has less reason to seek local work, which is the 'de sorte que' of line 3. Money spent on construction rather than on productive investment creates houses rather than jobs. The pressure on the person sending is relentless and largely invisible to the people receiving — the emigrant's own life is deferred, savings go home rather than into their situation abroad, and returning without having built the house is a social failure. Senegalese researchers and novelists have written about this at length, and it is discussed openly within families. **Both are true**, and the lesson leaves them both standing. 'Il n'a pas construit sa vie. Il a construit une maison ici' is not a verdict on remittances; it is a description of one man's accounts. **For a visitor**, two practical notes. Do not describe somebody's relative abroad as having 'made it' until you know more — the person sending money from Milan may be doing precarious work in difficult conditions, and the house is evidence of obligation rather than of comfort. And if you are asked, as you may be, to help somebody obtain a visa or to be a contact abroad, understand that the request is serious, is not casual, and that a vague promise is worse than a clear refusal. 'Je ne peux pas, et je ne veux pas te raconter d'histoires' is a sentence worth having.